Bitcoin Price Hovers Near $89K as $88K Support Becomes the Line in the Sand
BTC-USD defends the $88K–$90K zone after a drop from $95K, $630M in distributions, fresh $44M inflows and new inflation fears that threaten Fed cuts and keep $80K on the radar | That's TradingNEWS
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) price, range and late-cycle positioning
BTC-USD trading zone: $87,400 support, $95,000–$99,000 ceiling
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is trading around $89,000–$90,000, with live quotes near $89,151.73 and a daily move of about -1.2%. Earlier this week, price tested support around $87,400 and bounced back to the $90,000 area. On a larger horizon BTC is roughly 16% below a prior peak at $73,835 in one earlier cycle snapshot and has already seen a later cycle blow-off toward about $125,000, from which it has cooled back to the $90,000 region. Over a 30-day window in the older dataset, BTC fell about 9.2%, showing that recent pullbacks are not isolated. The current tape is a consolidation band between roughly $88,000–$90,000 on the downside and $95,000–$97,000 on the upside, with the broader structure capped near $99,000 where the 200-day moving average sits.
Daily trend: failed breakout at $95K–$97K and pressure on $88K–$90K floor
The daily chart shows BTC rejected from the $95,000–$97,000 resistance cluster. That zone aligned with a declining 100-day moving average and the upper line of a rising channel. After that failure, price slid back toward the $90,000 shelf, which also marks the lower boundary of the same channel and the origin of the last leg higher. The daily RSI rolled down from near overbought and is drifting toward neutral, confirming loss of upside momentum. As long as the $88,000–$90,000 region holds on closing prices, the pattern still allows a higher-low structure. A decisive daily close under that band opens a cleaner path toward the $80,000 demand zone that formed the November base.
Intraday structure: $90,000 pivot, short-term bounce from $87,400
On the 4-hour and 30-minute views, BTC has already broken away from the upper part of its rising channel and is now fighting to hold the mid-zone. Short term, price bounced from about $87,400 and retested the $90,000 level. The local RSI recovered from oversold and now sits around the mid-50s near 56.16, which is consistent with a corrective rebound rather than a new impulse. MACD on intraday frames has turned up with a bullish crossover and a positive histogram for the first time in several days. The message is simple: $90,000 has become a pivot. Trading above it favors a grind back toward the $91,694–$95,000 zone. Losing it cleanly pushes focus back to the $88,000 trendline, then to $85,000 and the bigger $80,000 support.
Key levels: EMAs, Supertrend and breakdown targets on BTC-USD
Moving averages and trend tools frame the battlefield clearly. On the upside, immediate resistance sits at $91,694 (20-day EMA), followed by $91,997 (50-day EMA). Higher up, $95,465 (100-day EMA) is the next major cap inside the recent range, and $99,042 (200-day EMA) is the trend-defining ceiling. The Supertrend flipped bearish at $96,483 and still hangs above price as a dynamic resistance band. On the downside, the ascending trendline from the December low around $80,000 currently offers support in the $88,000–$88,500 region. A clean break of that line points first to about $85,000 and then re-exposes the $80,000 demand block if selling accelerates.
Exchange flows: $630M distribution, then $44M inflow near $88K–$90K
On-chain flow data around the recent selloff shows a clear shake-out. On January 20, net outflows from exchanges reached about $591.61 million as BTC dropped to roughly $88,427, one of the largest single-day distributions in months. The next day saw another $38.60 million leave exchanges with price holding near $89,454, taking the two-day distribution to around $630 million. That phase likely flushed out “weak hands” that chased the rally above $95,000 and capitulated on the drop. On January 22, the pattern flipped, with roughly $43.97 million in net inflows as buyers stepped in near the $89,000–$90,000 area to absorb supply. When flows swing from heavy distribution into measured accumulation at lower prices, it often marks a local equilibrium point. It does not guarantee a durable bottom, but it does show that forced selling has eased and that the next move depends more on macro and technical levels than on pure liquidation pressure.
On-chain cycle metrics: LTH inflation at 1.9 and dormancy pointing to a late stage
Deep on-chain indicators suggest BTC is in a mature phase of its cycle, not an early accumulation stage. The long-term holder (LTH) inflation rate, which tracks whether long-term wallets are net accumulating or distributing relative to miner issuance, has risen steadily over two years and now sits around 1.9. Historically, bull peaks have occurred when this metric climbs above about 2.0, meaning distribution from older holders materially outweighs new coin issuance. Being just under that threshold implies significant but not yet complete cycle exhaustion. Dormancy Flow and its Z-score add another warning. Dormancy measures how many coins are being spent relative to their average age. Over the past three months, Dormancy has moved higher, and the Z-score peaked around April 2024. In prior cycles, such peaks have led price tops by roughly three months, suggesting that old coins moving again often front-run distribution phases. Rising clusters in Spent Volume, especially from 7–10 year-old coins, reinforce that long-term holders are taking profit into strength.
Mt. Gox overhang and large spent volumes in BTC-USD
A notable part of the 2024–2025 on-chain activity spike has come from preparation for Mt. Gox creditor repayments. More than $9 billion in BTC tied to that defunct exchange is being readied for distribution. Movement of those old balances appears in the 7–10 year Spent Volume spikes and creates a structural overhang: even if not all coins hit the open market, any portion that does will be incremental supply that did not exist in prior cycles. That does not kill the bull case, but it raises the bar for how much fresh demand is needed to offset long-dormant holders finally exiting positions at huge gains.
Network usage: falling active addresses despite $90K BTC-USD
Another on-chain signal arguing for caution is the slump in active addresses. The 30-day EMA of active Bitcoin addresses has been trending lower since early 2025 and is printing new lows even as price trades near $90,000. That negative divergence means the network is not onboarding broad new spot users at current valuations. Instead, price resilience has leaned on existing participants, leverage and derivatives activity. Historically, strong, sustainable uptrends have lined up with clear upturns in this activity metric. Until network participation turns higher alongside price, BTC at current levels looks more like a late-stage or range-bound structure than the start of a fresh, explosive leg.
Read More
-
SCHD ETF Price Forecast - SCHD at $29.14: Dividend Power Play as Markets Chase AI
22.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETFs XRPI and XRPR: $11.06, $15.82 and the Fight to Hold $1.90 on XRP-USD
22.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Natural Gas Futures Forecast - Price Rocket 75% to 2022 Highs on Arctic Blast and Storage Shock
22.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
USD/JPY Price Forecast - Pairs Charges Toward ¥159.45 as BoJ Risk and US Data Fuel Bullish Momentum
22.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
Macro backdrop: inflation risk, yields at 4.31% and rate-cut premium in BTC-USD
The macro story has turned less friendly. BTC recently held around $90,091 after bouncing off $87,400, but that resilience came just as new research warned that US inflation could push above 4% this year. The analysis points to four key drivers: consumer pass-through from renewed tariffs, tighter labor markets if large deportation waves reduce the workforce, fiscal deficits above 7% of GDP, and looser financial conditions. Those forces could overpower gains from AI-driven productivity and slower housing inflation. For Bitcoin, this matters because much of the recent bull case rests on expectations for aggressive Fed rate cuts. If inflation accelerates instead, policymakers have less room to cut and may even need to lean more hawkish. Markets currently price only modest easing, roughly 50–75 basis points this year in some projections. BTC is priced more optimistically than that. The 10-year Treasury yield already touched about 4.31%, a five-month high, and tracked new highs in Japanese government yields. Higher real yields raise the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset like BTC and pressure long-duration risk trades, including crypto.
Greenland tensions, volatility spikes and the “digital gold” stress test
Recent geopolitical stress around US–Europe tensions over Greenland has been another reality check for the “digital gold” narrative. Over one week of heightened risk around tariffs and military posturing, BTC dropped roughly 10%, behaving more like a high-beta risk asset than a defensive hedge. At the same time, physical gold gained about 5%, and over 2025 gold significantly outperformed BTC despite being framed as the less speculative asset. The pattern rhymes with earlier events. In March 2020, when COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, BTC suffered one of its worst single-month crashes before later rallying more than 4,000% into its ~$125,000 high. In each shock, BTC initially traded like a leveraged tech stock, not like a safe-haven store of value, while gold absorbed fear flows. That does not kill the long-term “digital gold” thesis, but it proves that in current market structure BTC is still treated first as a risk asset. The Greenland episode and the simultaneous Japanese bond selloff underlined that point again.
Store-of-value reality: gold vs BTC-USD, BlackRock narrative and real-world usage
The narrative around BTC has shifted from purely “peer-to-peer cash” toward a store-of-value and “asset of fear” profile. High-profile asset managers describe Bitcoin as a hedge against currency debasement. That narrative fits the fixed issuance schedule and the distrust in central bank discipline. However, central banks themselves still overwhelmingly prefer physical gold over BTC for reserves, and gold’s performance in 2025 versus Bitcoin backs that preference in the short term. At the same time, BTC’s functional value is real in specific situations. Adoption spikes in countries like Iran and Venezuela show that when citizens and states need to route around sanctions or capital controls, they often use the base Bitcoin network and, increasingly, stablecoins. Stablecoins, however, can be frozen by centralized issuers, while BTC at the base layer cannot. BTC therefore still offers unique censorship resistance, but the market has not yet repriced it to behave like a stable safe haven during every macro shock.
Institutionalization: Nomura’s yield fund and tokenized BTC demand
On the institutional side, structures around BTC are getting more sophisticated. A new tokenized Bitcoin Diversified Yield Fund (BDYF) has been launched by a major Japanese financial group’s digital arm. The fund is long-only BTC but layers on market-neutral strategies – arbitrage, lending, and options – to generate yield on top of spot price performance. It is targeted at accredited investors outside the US with a minimum ticket of $250,000, and uses regulated partners: a tokenization platform as the structuring layer and an institutional custodian for storage. This matters for BTC because it shifts some long-term demand from pure directional “number go up” bets toward structured products that can hold BTC through cycles while extracting carry. Such vehicles can be sticky sources of demand and can soften drawdowns when volatility spikes, though they do not eliminate price risk. They also show how tokenization, DeFi-style strategies and traditional asset management are merging around BTC as collateral.
Market structure: BTC-USD as high-beta macro asset, not pure hedge
Pulling the strands together, BTC still trades like a high-beta macro asset tethered to liquidity, rates and equity risk appetite. During the latest bout of tariff risk, BTC sold off double digits while gold rallied. Rising US and Japanese yields, concerns about inflation returning above 4%, and doubts over how deep the Fed can cut all weigh on the short-term profile. At the same time, structural tailwinds remain strong: a history of extreme post-crash rallies (4,000% off pandemic lows), deeper institutional integration via ETFs and tokenized funds, and real-world adoption in stressed economies. On-chain behavior, however, signals a late-cycle regime: LTH inflation near the 2.0 “top” threshold, rising dormancy, large movements of very old coins, a Mt. Gox overhang and declining active address participation while price is high. That is not a typical fresh-bull backdrop.
Trading stance for BTC-USD: key levels and Buy/Sell/Hold verdict
Short-term, the market has drawn a clear battlefield. On the upside, BTC needs to reclaim and hold above $90,000, then break through $91,694 (20-day EMA) and $91,997 (50-day EMA). A sustained move toward $95,000 and then $96,483 (Supertrend) would signal that the correction has likely run its course and open the door to retesting the mid-$90,000s and eventually the $99,042 200-day moving average. On the downside, repeated failures at $90,000 and a close below $88,000 would validate a deeper move toward $85,000 and possibly the $80,000 base zone. On-chain divergences and macro headwinds argue against aggressive chasing at current prices.
Verdict for BTC-USD based on the data: Hold, with a short-term bearish tilt and a structurally bullish long-term bias. The $88,000–$90,000 band is the line in the sand. Above it, patient accumulation with tight risk controls is justified for long-horizon investors. Below it, probability increases for a full test of $80,000, where a more attractive long-term Buy zone would emerge.