Natural Gas Price Forecast: NG=F Tests $3.50–$3.60 Floor Before LNG Wave

Natural Gas (NG=F) 2026 Setup: Warm-Winter Pressure Versus Structural Demand Shock

Short-Term Tape: NG=F Testing Support Around $3.50–$3.60 After Weather Hit

Front-month U.S. natural gas futures trade in the $3.58–$3.61/mmBtu area after dropping nearly 3% on the latest warm-weather runs, extending a year-end pullback from the $3.70–$3.75 zone. February futures recently traded near $3.745/mmBtu after a more than 5% drop when forecasts turned milder and a 38 bcf weekly storage withdrawal undershot expectations, leaving working gas at 3,375 bcf — 55 bcf below last year but still 58 bcf above the five-year average. Output remains heavy, with Lower 48 production around 110.1 bcfd and LNG feedgas close to a record 18.5 bcfd, reinforcing the idea that the market is digesting oversupply rather than staring at an imminent squeeze. Technically, NG=F is oscillating around the $3.60 area with a support band down to $3.50, a zone that lines up with prior demand and the attempt to fill a November gap. The recent slide shows futures failing to hold above the middle of the rising channel and losing the 50-day EMA near $3.70, while the 200-day EMA around $3.92 still caps the upside. Momentum indicators near the 40 region point to fading bullish pressure, not full-blown capitulation, which fits a controlled retracement inside an ongoing basing process.

Bank Decks, Government Projections And The Forward Curve For NG=F

Consensus Price Range: Mid-$3s Decks Versus $4+ Official Baseline

Lender price decks and official forecasts for 2026 have converged into a narrow, but important, range that anchors how producers hedge and how investors frame fair value for NG=F. A survey of 29 energy lenders cut the base-case 2026 U.S. gas price deck from $3.54 to $3.43/mmBtu, with a downside case at $2.79/mmBtu and an oil assumption of $55.44/bbl. Those numbers matter directly for borrowing bases, drilling plans and hedge books, because they define what banks regard as “underwrite-able” pricing when extending credit to gas-weighted producers. Against that conservative benchmark, federal projections are more constructive. The latest outlook has Henry Hub averaging $3.56/mmBtu in 2025 and stepping up to about $4.01/mmBtu in 2026, with dry gas output averaging 109.11 bcfd and LNG exports hitting roughly 16.3 bcfd. A separate survey of energy executives puts year-end 2026 Henry Hub even higher, around $4.19/mmBtu, with West Texas Intermediate crude near $62/bbl and Henry Hub having averaged $4.84/mmBtu over the response window. In other words, the forward “consensus corridor” for 2026 clustering between roughly $3.40 and $4.20 is above today’s ~$3.60 spot tape but not implying a return to the $7 blow-off seen in prior winters. For NG=F, that corridor implies modest upside from current levels with a recognized floor near the high-$2s in stress scenarios.

Weather, Storage And Why This Winter’s Tape Looks Heavy But Not Broken For NG=F

Short-term pressure on NG=F is still dominated by weather and storage dynamics. The latest 8–14-day outlook favors above-normal temperatures across much of the southern central and eastern U.S. into mid-January, precisely where a large share of heating load sits. Forecasts for the western and northern central regions lean closer to normal, but that is not enough to offset reduced heating degree days across the more populous belt. The 38 bcf storage withdrawal for the week ended Dec. 26 — smaller than traders expected — confirmed that inventories are not tightening fast enough to force a price spike. Stocks remain 58 bcf above the five-year average despite being slightly below last year. With Lower 48 demand, including exports, projected to ease next week and both production and LNG feedgas running at record or near-record levels, there is “not a whole lot of room” for NG=F to rally purely on winter burn. The market is effectively in a tug-of-war between the seasonal tendency for cold-weather spikes and the reality of abundant supply and softer-than-feared early-January demand. For now, that supports the view that $3.50–$3.60 is a working support zone, but without a strong meteorological catalyst it is hard to justify chasing price much above $3.90–$4.00 on weather alone.

Structural Demand Drivers: LNG Wave Two And AI Datacenters Rewire The NG=F Floor

Beneath the noise of weekly weather runs, the 2026–2028 set-up for Natural Gas (NG=F) is increasingly defined by structural demand additions rather than purely domestic heating cycles. Existing U.S. liquefaction capacity already sits around 17.5 bcfd, with an additional 15 bcfd under construction. Once these plants ramp and processing losses are included, incremental feedgas requirements of roughly 9.9–10.8 bcfd will need to be sourced from the U.S. grid. Part of that ramp is front-loaded: one gas producer expects about 4 bcfd of additional export capacity to come online in 2026 alone, while also flagging around 2.5 bcfd of incremental U.S. demand from data centers by decade-end. This combination – LNG growth plus large-load power demand – is the core reason why the official 2026 Henry Hub forecast at $4.01/mmBtu sits above both current spot levels and the bank decks’ $3.43 base case. At the same time, there is a non-trivial risk that global LNG markets become temporarily oversupplied as more U.S. trains start up. If too many projects hit commercial operation in a short window, export capacity may outpace near-term global demand, forcing LNG prices lower to clear the extra supply. For NG=F, that would show up as occasional softness in Gulf Coast basis or periods when export terminals do not run at full effective capacity, limiting how much domestic oversupply can be shipped offshore. The structural story, however, is that the marginal MMBtu is increasingly linked to seaborne demand and power-hungry AI infrastructure rather than just furnace load in the U.S. Northeast.

Japan, Henry Hub And The Globalisation Of NG=F Risk

A less visible, but important, shift for Natural Gas (NG=F) is the way global buyers are re-anchoring long-term contracts to Henry Hub. Japan, historically the benchmark of LNG diversification, is in the process of concentrating more of its future portfolio in U.S. volumes indexed to Henry Hub. Over the past year, Japanese utilities have signed at least 8.5 mtpa of new U.S. contracts, with the largest buyer targeting 10 mtpa of offtake from American projects by the early 2030s. If imports stay near current levels, the U.S. could become Japan’s largest supplier within five to six years, lifting its share from around 5% at the start of the decade to more than a quarter by 2030. That concentration means Henry Hub will increasingly transmit U.S. domestic fundamentals – weather, storage, shale activity, pipeline constraints and AI-driven power demand – directly into the delivered LNG price for a major consuming nation. For NG=F, this globalisation of risk cuts both ways. On one side, it deepens liquidity and hedging demand for Henry Hub-linked instruments, reinforcing its status as the reference contract for long-dated gas risk. On the other, it binds NG=F more tightly to geopolitical, policy and infrastructure developments in both directions: U.S. policy shifts or pipeline outages can ripple into Japanese utility costs, while decisions in Tokyo about contract tenor, portfolio composition and nuclear restarts feed back into long-term demand expectations for U.S. gas.

Technical Structure: NG=F Sitting On A Support Shelf With Clear Triggers

From a pure chart perspective, NG=F is sitting at an interesting inflection. Prices are drifting around the 200-day EMA, effectively testing whether the market is willing to defend a medium-term upturn after the autumn rally. The $3.60–$3.50 band is acting as a first support block, coinciding with prior reaction lows and the attempt to fill the November gap. Below that, $3.30 stands out as the next meaningful demand zone where the most recent up-leg initiated. On the topside, the 50-day EMA near $3.70 has flipped from support into near-term resistance, while the 200-day EMA around $3.92 remains a lid on any impulsive bounce. A sustained break back above $4.00 would signal that the market has absorbed the warm-weather hit and is willing to start pricing in the 2026 structural tightness story more aggressively. Conversely, a clean close below $3.50 – especially if coupled with another underwhelming storage withdrawal and continued record output – would strengthen the case for a deeper retest toward $3.30. Momentum is neutral-to-soft: RSI grinding toward 40, not yet oversold, and price action characterized by choppy consolidation rather than waterfall selling. That profile is more consistent with a search for a floor in a heavy tape than the start of a new bearish trend.

Fundamentals Versus Narrative: Data Centers, “Freedom Gas” And Reality For NG=F

Narratives around Natural Gas (NG=F) have swung sharply over the past year, from “AI-driven power crunch” to “oversupplied winter.” During the November run-up, talk of data-center-driven demand helped fuel calls for $7 gas, on the assumption that AI workloads would instantly and permanently transform the U.S. power stack. The current setup looks more nuanced. Yes, AI and high-density computing are set to add several Bcf/d of incremental demand by the late 2020s, and project pipelines in key regions like the U.S. East are being designed around gas-fired capacity. But those loads are ramping in steps, not overnight, and they coexist with efficiency gains, renewable builds and regulatory frictions that slow the pure-gas story. At the same time, the supply side has proven remarkably responsive. Associated gas from oil plays, plus dedicated dry-gas drilling, has pushed Lower 48 output to record levels even without heroic price incentives. That is why NG=F can trade around $3.60 with production above 110 bcfd and feedgas flows at records, yet without the market flipping into an outright glut at the benchmark. The real tension is between a structurally improving demand trend and a still-elastic supply machine. In 2026, the balance between those two forces – more LNG trains and power demand on one side, disciplined capital spending and potential productivity fatigue on the other – will determine whether Henry Hub trades closer to the lender decks’ $3.43 or the EIA’s $4-handle baseline.

Trading Stance On Natural Gas (NG=F): Near-Term Heavy, Medium-Term Constructive – RATING: HOLD

Pulling the pieces together – warm-weather pressure, storage still above the five-year average, record production, but a visible ramp in LNG and power demand and a forward consensus centered between roughly $3.40 and $4.20 – Natural Gas (NG=F) does not justify an aggressive directional bet at today’s ~$3.60. On a twelve- to eighteen-month horizon, a fair-value band in the mid-$3s to low-$4s looks reasonable, and the official $4.01–$4.19 averages imply moderate upside versus the current tape if structural demand arrives on schedule and supply growth eases from record pace. On the other hand, the lenders’ $2.79 downside case and the risk of temporary LNG oversupply highlight how quickly NG=F can trade down if project ramps slip, winter remains soft, or producers chase volume instead of capital discipline. Technically, the market is stuck between a defendable support shelf at $3.50–$3.60 and layered resistance into $3.90–$4.00, with no clear catalyst in the immediate term to force a breakout. Against that backdrop, the clean stance is a HOLD on NG=F at current levels: tactically, short-term traders can sell rallies toward $3.80–$3.90 and look to re-engage on dips closer to $3.30–$3.40; strategically, long-only exposure makes more sense accumulated on weakness rather than chased at the top of each weather-driven spike. Until storage trends, weather patterns or LNG ramp data shift decisively, natural gas remains a range-bound, structurally improving but not yet screaming-cheap commodity rather than a high-conviction buy or outright short.

That's TradingNEWS