Oil Price Forecast 2026: WTI at $57, Brent at $61 and Why $50 Still Looks Likely

Oil Price 2026: WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F) Trapped Between a 4% Glut and the Venezuela Gambit

Venezuela Shock: Political Earthquake, Modest Immediate Impact on Oil, WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F)

The US capture of Nicolás Maduro and Washington’s decision to “take control” of Venezuela’s oil narrative injected a sharp political shock into the Oil market but not a structural supply shock. On the screen, the move barely lifted futures: Brent (BZ=F) oscillated around $60–$61 per barrel, trading between a 0.4% drop to $60.54 and a 1.2% rebound to about $61.48. WTI (CL=F) moved in parallel, dipping 0.5% to roughly $57.04 and then recovering toward $58.11–$57.85 as traders recalibrated positions.

Equity markets told a different story. US energy names with Venezuelan leverage ripped higher. Chevron, already operating in the country under a special licence, jumped about 6.1%. ConocoPhillips added 5.7%, ExxonMobil gained 3.1%, and oilfield services group Halliburton surged as much as 7%. The equity tape is clearly pricing long-dated optionality on Venezuelan barrels, while Brent (BZ=F) and WTI (CL=F) remain anchored by near-term oversupply.

The bond market moved just as aggressively. A Venezuelan government bond maturing in 2027 climbed from roughly 31.5 cents on the dollar to above 40 cents, while another security that should have been repaid in 2022 rose from 31.5 to 34 cents. At the same time, Chinese regulators demanded banks disclose their Venezuelan exposure, signalling that Beijing is preparing for restructurings, write-downs, or both.

The signal is clear: the market believes Venezuela’s reserves matter for the long game, but front-month Oil pricing is still dominated by an old-fashioned glut.

Venezuela’s Reserves: 17% of Global Crude, Barely 1% of Current Oil Output

Venezuela holds about 303 billion barrels of proven crude, roughly 17% of the world’s reserves and more than Saudi Arabia on paper. Historically, the country pumped close to 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) in the 1970s, more than 7% of global output. Years of under-investment, sanctions, and logistical breakdown have crushed that figure.

Production averaged roughly 1.1 million bpd last year and has slid toward about 800,000 bpd, barely 1% of global supply. JPMorgan’s base case is that a political transition combined with capital inflows could lift volumes to 1.3–1.4 million bpd within two years, and, in an optimistic scenario, to around 2.5 million bpd over the next decade.

Those numbers matter when you overlay them on today’s oversupply. The global Oil market is already running a surplus of about 3.85 million bpd, close to 4% of world consumption. Adding several hundred thousand Venezuelan barrels on top of that—over time—leans clearly bearish for Brent (BZ=F) and WTI (CL=F) at the back of the curve. That is why JPMorgan flags a potential $4 per barrel downside to 2030 pricing if Venezuelan production climbs toward 2 million bpd.

Heavy Crude, Heavy Capex: Why Venezuelan Barrels Won’t Save or Squeeze WTI (CL=F) Overnight

The market is not dealing with cheap, light shale. Venezuela’s anchor asset is the Orinoco Belt—heavy to extra-heavy crude that requires diluent blending, upgrading, and a functioning logistics chain. After years of neglect, refineries such as El Palito are operating well below capacity and key infrastructure is decaying.

Any serious recovery in Venezuelan throughput requires:

• Upgrading ageing refineries and upgraders

• Re-establishing stable feedstock and diluent supply

• Rebuilding pipelines, export terminals, and storage

• Resolving sanctions, governance risk, and contract security

Former executives and strategists put it bluntly: this is a “very long-term project” measured in years and decades, not quarters. Even optimistic scenarios expect only a modest pickup in the next 24 months, with the true step-change—toward 2.5 million bpd—pushed into the 2030 horizon and beyond.

That timing gap explains the current price behaviour. Brent (BZ=F) around $60–$61 and WTI (CL=F) near $57–$58 are not responding to Maduro’s fall as a supply shock; they are pricing the reality that the embargo remains in force and sanctions still choke exports. The marginal barrel that matters for the next few quarters is not Venezuelan, it is OPEC+ policy and US supply discipline.

OPEC+: Policy on Hold While Brent (BZ=F) Sits at 5-Year Lows

OPEC+, including Saudi Arabia, Russia and the UAE, met after the Venezuela operation and made the least exciting decision possible: keep the pause on production increases in place until at least April. The group effectively admitted that its ability to put a floor under Oil is limited in a market already swimming in surplus.

In the near term, Venezuelan output may actually decline. Feedstock imports for blending heavy crude have been sharply limited by the naval blockade and sanctions. Joint venture partners have reportedly been asked to scale back production, with analysts identifying 200,000–300,000 bpd already shut in, and the risk of more volumes being curtailed as logistics and financing remain constrained.

That paradox defines the current setup for WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F):

• Structurally, the possibility of Venezuelan recovery is bearish for the 5–10 year strip

• Tactically, the next few quarters could even lose some Venezuelan barrels because of sanctions choke points

• OPEC+ is not stepping in with fresh cuts; instead it is sitting on its hands while speculative positioning leans heavily short

The market is choosing to trade the glut, not the disruption.

Bearish Structure in Brent (BZ=F): $60–$59 Support, $50 Flashing as Next Target

Technically, Brent (BZ=F) remains locked in a clear downtrend. The contract trades just below $61 per barrel, hovering above a critical support zone in the $60–$59 range that marks the lowest levels in roughly five years (going back to early 2021).

The short-term map looks like this in practice:

• The 50-period EMA is acting as dynamic resistance and forms the upper boundary of a bearish regression channel

• First resistance sits near $63.70, aligning with prior June lows now turned into resistance

• A more structural cap emerges around $65.50, where resistance converges with the 200-period EMA

• Above that, legacy supply zones cluster around $70 and $72, levels connected with the 2023 low band and second-half-2024 floors

If the $60–$59 platform breaks decisively, the next meaningful reference is near $50 per barrel, essentially revisiting the 2018–2019 troughs. With the market already described by senior analysts as “as bearish as it has been for at least a decade”, marked by record net shorts in Brent (BZ=F) and historically weak long exposure in WTI (CL=F), any failed bounce into the low-60s risks accelerating the downside.

For positioning, this technical structure does not justify aggressive upside targets from current levels. Rallies toward $63–$66 are more consistent with short-covering and tactical bounces than the start of a durable bull leg.

Forward Curve and Forecasts: 2026 Oil Strip Anchored in the Mid-$50s

Fundamental forecasts confirm what the curve is signalling. The US Energy Information Administration projects Brent (BZ=F) averaging around $55 in the first quarter of 2026, broadly flat through the rest of the year. A major US investment bank keeps its 2026 targets unchanged at about $56 for Brent and $52 for WTI (CL=F), even after the Venezuela shock.

In their Venezuela scenario where production rises to 2 million bpd by 2030, they see a $4 per barrel downside to long-dated prices versus previous assumptions. Another house expects Venezuelan output to stay roughly flat around 900,000 bpd in 2026, highlighting how gradual the recovery is likely to be, even under a friendlier political backdrop.

The key message for CL=F and BZ=F traders: the event risk in Caracas has not triggered a repricing of the 2026 strip. The market is still anchored around mid-50s averages with downside skew, reflecting the 3.85 million bpd surplus and skepticism that OPEC+ can—or will—aggressively cut its way out of the glut.

Risk Premium Migrates to Gold and Silver While Oil Trades Like a Pure Oversupply Story

Geopolitical stress has not disappeared; it has simply chosen a different asset class. While Brent (BZ=F) and WTI (CL=F) drift near multi-year lows, precious metals have surged as investors reload on non-fiat hedges.

On the day Oil slipped, spot gold gained roughly 1–2%, trading around $4,409–$4,430 per ounce. Silver rallied between 3.5% and 3.9% to about $75.3–$75.4, extending a run that already took the metal to an all-time high near $83.62 earlier in the week. Platinum advanced about 3.26% to $2,214, and palladium added 2.41% to $1,657, capping a 2025 performance where platinum jumped 127% and palladium 76%, their best year in about 15 years.

Base metals have also reacted, though more mildly. Copper trades around $5.85 per pound, up on the day but still just below its July 2025 record at $5.94. Here, the balancing act between tight supply and macro-growth worries keeps the tape choppy.

The divergence is stark: political risk that once reflexively bid Oil is now being expressed through gold, silver and, to a lesser extent, base metals. For CL=F and BZ=F, the Maduro event is currently a story about long-term supply drag on prices, not an immediate fear of lost barrels.

Equities and FX: Energy Stocks Price Long-Term Barrels While Oil and USD/CAD Trade the Cycle

Energy equities have reacted much more optimistically than the Oil strip. Chevron’s 6.1% rally, ConocoPhillips’ 5.7% gain and ExxonMobil’s 3.1% move reflect optionality on a scenario where US majors eventually rebuild Venezuela’s production base and unlock claims tied to earlier expropriations. One group alone is pursuing around $12 billion in compensation for past nationalisations.

Services names like Halliburton, up about 7%, are a straightforward leveraged play on a decade-long capex cycle in heavy-oil projects if the legal and sanctions fog clears. Equities are thus discounting a world in which Venezuela becomes investable again; CL=F and BZ=F are discounting a world in which barrels are abundant and demand growth is uncertain.

In FX, the oil narrative has collided with macro divergence. Late last year, USD/CAD was trading near 1.3770 with a mildly bearish technical tilt, helped by Oil stabilising around $82 per barrel. Since then, stronger-than-expected US data and weaker Canadian prints have rewritten the script.

• The US ISM Manufacturing PMI printed around 51.2, signalling expansion

• Canada’s Ivey PMI slipped below the 50 line to about 47.9, underscoring domestic slowdown

• The Federal Reserve has pivoted to a more patient stance on rate cuts, while markets expect the Bank of Canada to move sooner

As a result, USD/CAD has pushed toward the 1.3950 area and broken convincingly above the 100-day EMA near 1.3877. The usual positive correlation between Oil and the Canadian dollar is now overshadowed by rate divergence. Even if WTI (CL=F) manages episodic rallies from depressed levels, a firm US dollar and dovish BoC bias keep the path of least resistance for USD/CAD tilted higher.

For macro traders, the message is that oil’s weakness is now reinforcing, not leading, the FX story: a structurally soft CL=F backdrop supports a weaker CAD, but the dominant driver is the policy gap.

Venezuelan Debt, Chinese Banks and the Legal Friction Behind Oil Flows

The rally in Venezuelan bonds from roughly 31.5 to above 40 cents on the dollar is not just a technical squeeze; it is a repricing of recovery odds. The combination of regime change risk, US control over sanctions, and the implicit message that Washington wants to monetise Venezuelan reserves has pushed distressed debt buyers back into the market.

At the same time, Chinese regulators have required large banks to map out their Venezuelan exposure, anticipating restructurings, potential haircuts and changes in project financing. Shipping insurers, refiners and traders will now have to navigate a volatile landscape of evolving licences, shifting sanctions, and contested ownership claims over upstream assets.

For Oil, this translates into higher legal and operational friction in the short term. Tanker routing, insurance pricing, and counter-party risk premiums could all rise before any incremental barrel hits the water. Analysts specialising in energy geopolitics underline that what is returning is not “free” Venezuelan supply, but a fresh layer of uncertainty that the market must discount.

Scenario Map for 2026: WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F) Under Three Paths

Putting the numbers together, the forward-looking landscape for Oil is best understood through a simple scenario grid:

Base Case – Prolonged Glut, Gradual Venezuela

• Global surplus stays near 3–4 million bpd through much of 2026

• OPEC+ maintains cautious policy with limited additional cuts

• Venezuela’s production inches from ~800,000 bpd toward 900,000–1,000,000 bpd, not meaningfully changing the balance

• Brent (BZ=F) averages around $55–$58, WTI (CL=F) around $50–$54

• Price range for Brent broadly $50–$65 with rallies sold into resistance at $63.70–$65.50

Bear Case – Support Fails, Demand Disappoints

• Global growth slows more than expected, pressuring demand

• OPEC+ cohesion weakens, compliance slips, and US output remains resilient

• Surplus widens beyond 4 million bpd

• Brent’s $60–$59 floor breaks cleanly, BZ=F trades down toward $50; CL=F revisits mid-40s

• Long-dated curves cheapen as Venezuelan recovery adds extra downside to 2030 pricing

Bull Case – Supply Shock Elsewhere, OPEC+ Regains Control

• A non-Venezuelan disruption (Middle East, shipping lanes, or US shale discipline) removes 1–2 million bpd from the market

• OPEC+ re-introduces deeper cuts and achieves strong compliance

• Venezuela remains constrained by sanctions and logistics, limiting new barrels

• Brent (BZ=F) reclaims the $70–$72 band, WTI (CL=F) pushes back into the low-60s

• However, current positioning (record shorts, weak longs) means much of the early move would be short-covering rather than a sustainable structural re-rating

Against the current data—oversupply of 3.85 million bpd, unchanged mid-50s forecasts, and Venezuela’s slow ramp—the base and bear cases carry materially higher probability than the near-term bull scenario.

Investment View on Oil, WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F) – Verdict: Bearish Bias, Sell Rallies

All the key inputs point in the same direction:

• Spot prices: Brent (BZ=F) stuck just above a multi-year floor at $60–$59, WTI (CL=F) capped in the high-50s

• Fundamentals: a 3.85 million bpd surplus, with the potential for more barrels over the decade as Venezuela normalises

• Policy: OPEC+ holding, not tightening, while record speculative shorts reflect deep scepticism about any lasting rebound

• Forecasts: 2026 averages pinned around $56 for Brent and $52 for WTI, with explicit $4 downside to 2030 curves in a Venezuelan recovery scenario

• Cross-asset signals: energy equities and Venezuelan debt are trading optionality, while precious metals and the dollar are absorbing the geopolitical risk premium

From a trading and allocation standpoint, that backdrop does not justify a structural long stance in Oil at current levels. The more consistent approach with the data is:

• Treat moves in Brent (BZ=F) toward $63.70–$65.50 and WTI (CL=F) into the low-60s as opportunities to sell rallies, not chase breakouts

• Respect the $60–$59 zone in Brent as important but fragile; a clear weekly close below it opens the path toward $50

• Use options or defined-risk structures if fading short-term squeezes driven by headlines out of Caracas, Washington or OPEC+ meetings

On the numbers, the stance is straightforward:
Oil, WTI (CL=F), Brent (BZ=F): Bearish bias – effectively a Sell on strength, not a core long, as long as the 3–4 million bpd surplus and mid-50s 2026 strip remain intact and Venezuelan recovery is a decade-scale, price-negative story rather than an immediate bullish catalyst.

That's TradingNEWS