Natural Gas Price Forecast: NG=F Falls to $3.80–$3.94 as Warm Winter Kills $5.50 Spike
Mild US forecasts, near-record 109.5 Bcf/d production, record 10.9M-ton LNG exports and EIA’s $4.30 winter target leave natural gas volatile but pinned under $4.00 | That's TradingNEWS
Read More
-
SMH ETF: NASDAQ:SMH Hovering at $350 With AI, NVDA and CHIPS Act Fueling the Next Move
16.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETFs XRPI and XRPR: Can $1B Inflows Lift XRP-USD From $1.93 Back Toward $3.66?
16.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Oil Price Forecast - Oil Slide Hard; WTI CL=F Near $55, Brent BZ=F Below $60 as Market Bets on 2026 Supply Glut
16.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
USD/JPY Price Forecast - USDJPY=X Slides, BoJ 0.50% Hike, Fed Cut and NFP Set the Next Big Move
16.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
European Gas And LNG Feedback Loop: Why TTF Stability Matters To Natural Gas (NG=F)
European gas dynamics have turned into a global shock absorber for Natural Gas (NG=F) and LNG exporters. With TTF near €26.78/MWh and UK hubs around 70–71.5 p/therm, and storage at roughly 69.75% with strong Norwegian and LNG inflows, Europe is far from the panic levels seen in prior crises. Reuters-style commentary emphasizes that supply is “ample,” and that current prices can absorb moderate demand spikes from cooler weather or low wind generation without forcing an emergency bidding war for cargoes. Because Europe has become the primary destination for U.S. LNG – about 70% of November’s record 10.9 million metric tonnes of exports – this stability feeds back into U.S. pricing. When TTF trades calmly in the mid-€20s and storage numbers look manageable, global traders are less inclined to price in extreme scarcity or redirect U.S. cargoes at any cost. That keeps NG=F constrained by domestic balances and weather, rather than being yanked higher by overseas shocks.
Short-Term Scenarios For Natural Gas (NG=F): Bearish Tape, Seasonal Tail-Risk
Right now, the near-term scenarios for Natural Gas (NG=F) are framed by weather and technical levels rather than by any single geopolitical or structural shock. The bearish path is straightforward: if forecast models continue to show warmer-than-normal conditions into late December and early January, with production holding near 109.5–109.7 Bcf/d and storage staying slightly above normal, the market can keep probing support in the high-$3s. A decisive break below $3.950 channel support would validate targets around $3.650 and $3.480, roughly in line with the 200-day EMA near $3.60, and would turn the recent pullback into a full retracement of the early-December spike. The bullish scenario is less about valuation and more about a regime change in the inputs. If models reload with a colder pattern that meaningfully raises heating degree day counts, especially across the Midwest and Northeast, and if that cold period aligns with stronger LNG feedgas and larger storage withdrawals than the market currently expects, NG=F can rebuild a winter premium quickly. In that case, oversold technicals and light positioning could fuel a sharp rally back above $4.200, and potentially into the mid-$4s where resistance near $4.510 becomes relevant again.
Risk Management View: Volatility Profile And Seasonal Asymmetry In NG=F
One of the critical characteristics of Natural Gas (NG=F) in December is its volatility asymmetry. The downside from $3.80–$3.94 into the low-$3s is meaningful, but it tends to be more incremental and data-driven. The upside, however, can be explosive if a cold surprise appears. FX-style commentary correctly highlights that a single weather update can add $1.00 to the price in short order, especially when traders are complacent and short volatility. This is why some professional traders refuse to short natural gas “in the dead of winter” even when the chart is clearly bearish: the probability of a sudden, violent short squeeze is structurally higher in December–February than in shoulder seasons. The practical implication is that risk-reward for fresh shorts at current levels is less attractive than it might appear on a static chart, while tactical longs require patience and a clear trigger rather than blind bottom-fishing against a falling knife.
Investment Stance On Natural Gas (NG=F) At $3.80–$3.94: Hold With Short-Term Bearish Bias, Tactical Bullish Skew On Deeper Weakness
On the data available for Natural Gas (NG=F) on 16 December 2025, the market is in a downtrend driven by warmer weather, record-level supply and comfortable storage, but it is also entering price territory where medium-term fundamentals no longer justify aggressive new shorts. Front-month NG=F has dropped about 27% from a three-year high of $5.496 to roughly $3.80–$3.94, trades below the $4.200 resistance and is leaning on support around $3.950, with additional downside markers at $3.650, $3.480 and the 200-day EMA near $3.60. EIA’s framework points to a winter average near $4.30, a 2025 mean around $3.56 and a 2026 mean near $4.01, with production at about 109–109.11 Bcf/d and end-season storage near 2,000 Bcf. Global benchmarks – TTF around €26.78/MWh, JKM near $10.70, European storage around 69.75% – are calm, not stressed. LNG exports are robust at 10.9 million tonnes in November with 70% heading to Europe, but not enough to offset mild weather as the dominant marginal driver. Taking all of this together, my stance on Natural Gas (NG=F) at current levels is a Hold, with a short-term bearish bias as long as price stays under $4.200, and a tactical bullish skew on deeper weakness into the $3.60–$3.65 zone if a credible colder-weather shift appears. Structurally, the contract does not justify an outright bullish label while forecasts remain warm and the trend is down, but the combination of winter seasonality, oversold momentum and only modest discount to EIA’s projected averages argues against treating it as a clean Sell here. For portfolio framing, NG=F is best classified as Hold, tactically accumulate on confirmed cold-driven dips, avoid fresh shorts in the heart of winter, with the bias shifting to outright bullish only if the market reclaims $4.200 and starts to price a genuine re-tightening of balances.