Oil Prices Spike Toward $59 WTI and $63 Brent as Iran Unrest and Venezuela Upheaval Hit Supply Risk

Oil (WTI CL=F, Brent BZ=F) Reprices Geopolitical Risk From Venezuela to Iran

WTI CL=F and Brent BZ=F Push to One-Month Highs at $58–$62

The front contracts of WTI (CL=F) and Brent (BZ=F) have climbed back into a higher trading band. U.S. crude is changing hands around $58.29 per barrel, up about 0.60% intraday and roughly 3% on the week, while Brent is near $61.63, up 0.59% on the session and more than 4% week-to-date. A separate snapshot has WTI settling closer to $59.12 and Brent at $63.34, both adding about 2.2%–2.4% on the day and again showing weekly gains of roughly 3% for CL=F and 4% for BZ=F.
This is not a random bounce. The market is systematically rebuilding a geopolitical premium after political shocks in Venezuela, intensifying protests in Iran, and continuing military risk around Russia–Ukraine. At the same time, prices are still far below the panic highs briefly seen when strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities sent WTI above $73.50 and Brent toward $76.80, so the tape is repricing risk from a relatively depressed base rather than from euphoria.

Venezuela: From Maduro’s Arrest to U.S. Control of Exports

The Venezuela leg of this story starts with the removal and arrest of President Nicolás Maduro and his transfer to the United States on drug- and weapons-related charges. That instantly raised questions about the stability and trajectory of Venezuelan oil output.
The second step is more structural: Washington has moved to control Venezuelan oil sales and revenue indefinitely, demanding “full access” to the sector. Up to 50 million barrels stored by state company PDVSA are being lined up for marketing under U.S. oversight. Major players such as Chevron, Vitol and Trafigura are competing to win these marketing mandates.
For Oil / CL=F / BZ=F, this creates a two-sided impact:

• In the short run, legal and political uncertainty around contracts, payment flows and shipping schedules tightens perceived supply, helping push WTI into the $58–$59 zone and Brent into the $61–$63 band.

• Over the medium term, if the U.S. succeeds in stabilising management and exporting stored barrels efficiently, Venezuelan flows could actually add barrels to the market, partially offsetting disruptions elsewhere and capping BZ=F upside.
  The market is trading the near-term instability, not the longer-term rationalisation, which is why any headline around auction outcomes or export licence structures is immediately reflected in oil futures.

Iran: Street Protests, Internet Blackouts and the Strait of Hormuz Shadow

The more acute risk premium in WTI CL=F and Brent BZ=F comes from Iran. Protests over economic hardship have spread across major cities including Tehran, Mashhad and Isfahan, accompanied by a nationwide internet blackout. Iran is a significant producer within OPEC, and the unrest is now seen as having a credible probability of disrupting production or logistics, even if only temporarily.
This sits on top of an older, more structural risk: Hormuz transit. After earlier strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Tehran threatened to block or restrict the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-third of global seaborne oil and about one-fifth of LNG pass. When that risk first flared, WTI spiked as much as 6.2% intraday and Brent as much as 5.7%, before both contracts faded to end around $73.55 and $76.78 respectively. Analysts estimated that around $12 per barrel of geopolitical risk premium had been built into prices at that point.
Scenario work on BZ=F shows the convexity clearly:

• A 1.75 million bpd loss of Iranian supply could push Brent toward the $90 area.

• A more extreme scenario, where flows through Hormuz fall 50% for one month and then stay 10% below normal for another 11 months, could briefly drive BZ=F toward $110.
  Right now the curve is not fully pricing these extremes, but as protests “gather momentum” and the political system responds with force, traders are forced to assign non-trivial odds to partial disruption. That is a major reason why a relatively modest move in the front contract—WTI up into the high $50s—still masks very large option value on the upside if something breaks.

Russia–Ukraine Escalation: Energy Infrastructure Back in the Crosshairs

The Russia–Ukraine leg of the premium is less visible on screens but still material. Recent missile salvos have included launches of the Oreshnik hypersonic system against Ukrainian targets, with energy infrastructure explicitly mentioned. Every time strikes threaten gas processing, storage or power assets, the market revisits the possibility of knock-on effects into European gas and refined products, which can in turn pull crude higher.
The key here is correlation. Energy infrastructure hits in Eastern Europe do not automatically remove crude barrels, but they raise the volatility of regional supply chains and push refiners and traders to hold higher precautionary stocks, supporting CL=F and BZ=F against what would otherwise be purely bearish fundamentals.

OPEC Output, Inventories and the Oversupply Anchor

On the fundamentals side, the price action in Oil / CL=F / BZ=F is climbing a wall built from oversupply and rising stocks. Latest production surveys show OPEC pumping around 28.40 million bpd, down roughly 100,000 bpd from the revised November figure, with the sharpest declines coming from Iran and Venezuela. That headline is bullish, but inventories tell a different story: global stocks are still rising, and analysts flag oversupply as the primary constraint on a sustainable rally.
Unless the Iran unrest or Venezuela reshuffle leads to concrete and sustained production losses, the current rebound is at risk of stalling in the low-$60s for Brent and high-$50s for WTI. This is exactly why price moves of 2%–3% on individual days are not yet morphing into a clean trend: there is enough spare capacity and stored oil to absorb moderate disruptions, so speculative long positioning needs constant geopolitical fuel to stay engaged.

U.S. Rig Count and Supply Response: Slowdown, Not Collapse

The U.S. shale complex remains a key swing factor. The combined oil and gas rig count has edged down by 2 units to around 544, the lowest since mid-December. That reading shows modest drilling fatigue, not a sharp retrenchment. The message for CL=F is that U.S. supply growth may flatten at the margin, but there is no sign of an outright collapse that would justify panic bidding.
With the White House pushing to unlock Venezuelan barrels and simultaneously pushing domestic producers for reliability, the medium-term picture for supply into WTI CL=F remains adequate unless multiple geopolitical risks hit simultaneously.

Refined Products: Heating Oil and Gasoline Strength vs Natural Gas Weakness

Product markets confirm that not all energy segments are trading the same story:

• Heating oil has climbed about 1.10% to roughly $2.1425 per gallon, reflecting both crude’s bounce and seasonal demand.

• Gasoline is up about 1.11% to around $1.7799 per gallon, sensitive to both crude input costs and expectations for driving demand. Historical rule-of-thumb relationships suggest that every $1 move in crude roughly translates to 2.4 cents per gallon at the pump. Sustained strength in CL=F and BZ=F therefore feeds almost mechanically into higher retail fuel prices with a lag.

• Natural gas, by contrast, has dropped 5.75% to about $3.211 per MMBtu, highlighting oversupply and softer weather-driven demand in gas even as liquids tighten.
  This divergence reinforces the idea that the oil price rally is geopolitically driven, not a generic energy squeeze, which is why gas can slide while Oil / WTI / CL=F grinds higher.

Macro Demand: Summer Driving and the Hidden Tax Channel

The earlier spike around the Iran strike episode came as markets headed into the summer driving season, when U.S. gasoline demand typically peaks. With crude having added around 10% since the start of that conflict period, the implied pump impact is significant: a $10 rise in crude can theoretically add around 24 cents per gallon to retail prices.
That acts as a shadow tax on consumers and, if extended, can feed back into lower demand. At today’s $58–$63 band for WTI CL=F and Brent BZ=F, the burden is manageable, but any sustained push toward the $90–$110 scenarios discussed earlier would eventually pressure consumption, especially in price-sensitive emerging markets. The market knows this and therefore treats the $90+ area on BZ=F as a zone where demand destruction starts to become a meaningful counterforce to geopolitical premiums.

Risk Matrix for CL=F and BZ=F: Oversupply Base vs Disruption Tail

Put the pieces together and the risk profile for Oil / WTI (CL=F) / Brent (BZ=F) looks asymmetric:

• Base case (range-bound): Ongoing protests in Iran, political reshuffling in Venezuela and continued Russia–Ukraine headlines remain contained in terms of volume loss. Rising global inventories and a still-adequate OPEC+ output profile keep Brent mostly in a $60–$70 range and WTI in $55–$65. Periodic spikes on headlines are sold into as traders lean on the oversupply anchor.

• Bullish tail (disruption): A genuine shutdown or significant impairment of Iranian exports, a tighter choke on Hormuz, or serious logistical chaos in Venezuela take 1–2 million bpd or more off the market. In that case, the previously modelled $90–$110 range for BZ=F comes into play, with CL=F lagging by a few dollars. The weekly 3%–4% gains we are seeing now would be the opening act, not the climax.

• Bearish tail (macro shock): A sharp deterioration in global growth or a financial shock that hits risk assets could see oil sell off despite geopolitical strain, as happened in previous cycles where demand collapsed faster than supply could adjust. With WTI having already fallen back from the mid-$70s spike to the high-$50s, the immediate downside is smaller than it was pre-correction, but a clean break below $55 would reopen the low-$50s conversation if macro data turns.

Verdict on Oil / WTI CL=F / Brent BZ=F: Data-Backed Buy with Volatility

Given current levels and the full set of data:

• Prices: WTI CL=F around $58–$59, Brent BZ=F roughly $61–$63.

• Weekly performance: about +3% for CL=F, +4% for BZ=F.

• Geopolitics: active unrest in Iran, political and commercial restructuring in Venezuela, ongoing conflict around Ukraine, and credible risk scenarios that justify $90–$110 Brent if supply is materially hit.

• Fundamentals: OPEC output at 28.40 million bpd, only 100,000 bpd down month-on-month, inventories still building, U.S. rigs easing to 544 but not collapsing, and natural gas signalling that this is not a universal energy squeeze.
  The risk-reward skew favours a bullish stance at these prices. The market is paying you a visible geopolitical premium, but the absolute level of CL=F and BZ=F remains far below the modelled stress scenarios, while the downdraft potential is constrained by the fact that oversupply is already in the price.
  On that basis, Oil / WTI (CL=F) / Brent (BZ=F) justify a “Buy” rating on a tactical and swing-trading horizon, with the understanding that:

• The core long should be sized for headline volatility around Iran and Venezuela.

• A decisive collapse in protests or a rapid normalisation of Venezuelan flows would downgrade the stance to Hold, as the market would revert to trading the oversupply anchor.

• Conversely, any verified disruption of Hormuz flows or Iranian production that moves realised losses towards the 1–2 million bpd band turns the current high-$50s / low-$60s zone into the wrong price, with upside toward the $90+ trajectory for BZ=F.
  Right now, the tape shows Oil rebuilding risk from a compressed base. The numbers say you are being over-paid for the downside you are taking in CL=F and BZ=F, which is why the stance is Buy, geopolitically volatile, with eyes locked on Iran and Venezuela as the decisive catalysts.

That's TradingNEWS